A look at how ZEDEDA is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.
ZEDEDA is cited in 10 of 38 AI answers. It shows up on Edge Orchestration, Zededa. It is absent on Edge Computing, Edge Management, Iot Edge.
AI answers fire on 97% of tracked queries, yet ZEDEDA is quoted in only 26% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.
See the full query-by-query breakdown →
| Topic | Presence in AI answers | Buyer intent |
|---|---|---|
| Edge Orchestration | Owned | positioning |
| Zededa | Owned | comparison |
| Edge Computing | Invisible | positioning |
| Edge Management | Invisible | positioning |
| Iot Edge | Invisible | positioning |
| Edge Infrastructure | Invisible | positioning |
Problem Aware. overview queries: ZEDEDA appears on 2 of 6 themes.
Solution Aware. Owned on Edge Orchestration, Zededa; absent on Edge Computing, Edge Management, Iot Edge.
Alternatives. 5 themes name the brand without citing it; 23 queries answer without it at all.
Executed by AUQ for B2B SaaS teams with the same gaps this audit found.
39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means ZEDEDA's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.
| Query | Type | ZEDEDA in the AI answer | Top sources cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| best edge computing | Positioning | Absent | portainer.io, solutions.nextcomputing.com, intellizence.com |
| edge computing vendors | Positioning | Cited | altexsoft.com, datamation.com, zpesystems.com |
| edge computing solutions | Positioning | Absent | cisco.com, scalecomputing.com, advantech.com |
| edge computing software | Positioning | Absent | azure.microsoft.com, ibm.com, hp.com |
| edge computing platform | Positioning | Absent | scalecomputing.com, stlpartners.com, portainer.io |
| top edge computing providers | Positioning | Absent | datacentremagazine.com, fool.com, gartner.com |
| edge computing comparison | Positioning | Absent | zpesystems.com, digi.com, akamai.com |
| best edge orchestration | Positioning | No AI answer | |
| edge orchestration vendors | Positioning | Cited | zpesystems.com, nearbycomputing.com, edgeir.com |
| edge orchestration solutions | Positioning | Cited | zededa.com, avassa.io, youtube.com |
| edge orchestration software | Positioning | Cited | zededa.com, youtube.com, portainer.io |
| edge orchestration platform | Positioning | Named, not cited | nearbycomputing.com, qksgroup.com, edgeir.com |
| top edge orchestration providers | Positioning | Named, not cited | techtarget.com, nearbycomputing.com, qksgroup.com |
| edge orchestration comparison | Positioning | Absent | avassa.io, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, kamiwaza.ai |
| best edge management | Positioning | Absent | portainer.io, hpe.com, technologyradius.com |
| edge management vendors | Positioning | Named, not cited | iotechsys.com, aveva.com, gartner.com |
| edge management solutions | Positioning | Absent | aveva.com, hpe.com, edgemanagements.com |
| edge management software | Positioning | Absent | cloudera.com, hilscher.com, chef.io |
| edge management platform | Positioning | Absent | hpe.com, aveva.com, portainer.io |
| top edge management providers | Positioning | Named, not cited | portainer.io, gartner.com, technologyradius.com |
| edge management comparison | Positioning | Absent | hpe.com, portainer.io, avassa.io |
| best iot edge | Positioning | Absent | portainer.io, cactuscompute.com, g2.com |
| iot edge vendors | Positioning | Absent | azure.microsoft.com, advantech.com, digi.com |
| iot edge solutions | Positioning | Cited | advantech.com, bosch-iot-suite.com, supermicro.com |
| iot edge software | Positioning | Absent | learn.microsoft.com, edgexfoundry.org, azure.microsoft.com |
| iot edge platform | Positioning | Absent | azure.microsoft.com, edgexfoundry.org, fortinet.com |
| top iot edge providers | Positioning | Absent | snuc.com, portainer.io, g2.com |
| iot edge comparison | Positioning | Absent | developer.ibm.com, learn.microsoft.com, youtube.com |
| best edge infrastructure | Positioning | Absent | portainer.io, sunbirddcim.com, penguinsolutions.com |
| edge infrastructure vendors | Positioning | Absent | crn.com, vertiv.com, aws.amazon.com |
| edge infrastructure solutions | Positioning | Absent | netrality.com, vertiv.com, sunbirddcim.com |
| edge infrastructure software | Positioning | Absent | lenovo.com, sunbirddcim.com, intel.com |
| edge infrastructure platform | Positioning | Absent | scalecomputing.com, portainer.io, lumen.com |
| top edge infrastructure providers | Positioning | Named, not cited | datacentremagazine.com, techtarget.com, aws.amazon.com |
| edge infrastructure comparison | Positioning | Cited | zpesystems.com, portainer.io, digitalocean.com |
| alternatives to ZEDEDA | Comparison | Cited | gartner.com, cbinsights.com, zededa.com |
| ZEDEDA vs Azure IoT Edge | Comparison | Cited | zededa.com, help.zededa.com, iotevolutionworld.com |
| ZEDEDA vs AWS IoT Greengrass | Comparison | Cited | zededa.com, linkedin.com, technologyradius.com |
| ZEDEDA vs VMware Edge | Comparison | Cited | zededa.com, youtube.com, linkedin.com |
ZEDEDA is cited in 10 of the 38 AI answers we triggered.
ZEDEDA presents as edge computing, edge orchestration, edge management, iot edge, edge infrastructure. AI Overviews cite it on Edge Orchestration, Zededa and it is absent on Edge Computing, Edge Management, Iot Edge.
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days
Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days
ZEDEDA Home Skip to content Why ZEDEDA Why ZEDEDA ZEDEDA unifies edge infrastructure, inference, and autonomous agents so enterprises can run and scale edge intelligence across thousands of sites. Customers See how leading organizations arezededa.com, 2026
Differentiators it leads with: ZEDEDA, Edge Computing, Edge Orchestration, Edge Management.
Cited as a provider on Edge Orchestration, Zededa queries.
Appears alongside portainer.io, youtube.com, azure.microsoft.com.
| Domain AI cites | Pages | Context |
|---|---|---|
| portainer.io | 21 | Cited on 21 of the queries we tested. |
| youtube.com | 16 | Cited on 16 of the queries we tested. |
| azure.microsoft.com | 16 | Cited on 16 of the queries we tested. |
| scalecomputing.com | 10 | Cited on 10 of the queries we tested. |
| aws.amazon.com | 10 | Cited on 10 of the queries we tested. |
| stlpartners.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| gartner.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| intel.com | 8 | Cited on 8 of the queries we tested. |
| helindata.com | 8 | Cited on 8 of the queries we tested. |
| hpe.com | 7 | Cited on 7 of the queries we tested. |
See which queries each peer won →
Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of ZEDEDA on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.
| Peer | How AI frames it |
|---|---|
| portainer.io | Cited on 21 of the tested queries. |
| youtube.com | Cited on 16 of the tested queries. |
| azure.microsoft.com | Cited on 16 of the tested queries. |
| scalecomputing.com | Cited on 10 of the tested queries. |
| aws.amazon.com | Cited on 10 of the tested queries. |
| stlpartners.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| gartner.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| intel.com | Cited on 8 of the tested queries. |