A look at how Tenderly is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.
Tenderly is cited in 21 of 39 AI answers. It shows up on Smart Contract Debugging, Transaction Simulation, Smart Contract Monitoring. It is absent on Web3 Development, Blockchain Node Rpc.
AI answers fire on 100% of tracked queries, yet Tenderly is quoted in only 54% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.
Tenderly positions itself around web3 development, smart contract debugging, transaction simulation, blockchain node RPC, smart contract monitoring.tenderly.co, 2026
Differentiators it leads with: Web3 Development, Smart Contract Debugging, Transaction Simulation, Blockchain Node RPC.
Cited as a provider on Smart Contract Debugging, Transaction Simulation, Smart Contract Monitoring queries.
Appears alongside alchemy.com, quicknode.com, medium.com.
See the full query-by-query breakdown →
| Topic | Presence in AI answers | Buyer intent |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Contract Debugging | Owned | positioning |
| Transaction Simulation | Owned | positioning |
| Smart Contract Monitoring | Owned | positioning |
| Tenderly | Owned | comparison |
| Web3 Development | Invisible | positioning |
| Blockchain Node Rpc | Invisible | positioning |
Problem Aware. Overview queries: Tenderly appears on 4 of 6 themes.
Solution Aware. Owned on Smart Contract Debugging, Transaction Simulation, Smart Contract Monitoring; absent on Web3 Development, Blockchain Node Rpc.
Alternatives. 2 themes name the brand without citing it; 16 queries answer without it at all.
Executed by AUQ for B2B SaaS teams with the same gaps this audit found.
39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means Tenderly's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.
| Query | Tenderly in the AI answer | Top sources cited |
|---|---|---|
| best web3 development | Absent | codewave.com, youtube.com, ethereum.stackexchange.com |
| web3 development vendors | Absent | medium.com, clutch.co, ndlabs.dev |
| web3 development solutions | Absent | devcom.com, revinfotech.com, ontiktechnology.com |
| web3 development software | Absent | coursera.org, youtube.com, thirdweb.com |
| web3 development platform | Absent | alchemy.com, thirdweb.com, codex.io |
| top web3 development providers | Absent | pixelwebsolutions.com, fetchfunnel.com, indiehackers.com |
| web3 development comparison | Absent | blockeden.xyz, alchemy.com, learn.aptoslabs.com |
| best smart contract debugging | Cited | youtube.com, medium.com, hashtagweb3.com |
| smart contract debugging vendors | Absent | vegavid.com, linkedin.com, sourceforge.net |
| smart contract debugging solutions | Cited | youtube.com, medium.com, docs.oracle.com |
| smart contract debugging software | Cited | sitepoint.com, devdojo.com, tenderly.co |
| smart contract debugging platform | Cited | alchemy.com, yespress.io, github.com |
| top smart contract debugging providers | Cited | fluidrwa.com, ethereum.stackexchange.com, archive.trufflesuite.com |
| smart contract debugging comparison | Named, not cited | metamask.io, medium.com, youtube.com |
| best transaction simulation | Cited | youtube.com, nerdwallet.com, tenderly.co |
| transaction simulation vendors | Cited | dwellir.com, futureagi.com, createasoft.com |
| transaction simulation solutions | Cited | youtube.com, ieeexplore.ieee.org, neapay.com |
| transaction simulation software | Cited | tenderly.co, blocknative.com, alchemy.com |
| transaction simulation platform | Cited | youtube.com, arxiv.org, easychair.org |
| top transaction simulation providers | Cited | createasoft.com, tenderly.co, docs.tenderly.co |
| transaction simulation comparison | Cited | cryptoapis.io, rfp.wiki, bitquery.io |
| best blockchain node rpc | Absent | dwellir.com, instanodes.io, onfinality.io |
| blockchain node rpc vendors | Absent | alchemy.com, bitcoinfoundation.org, chainstack.com |
| blockchain node rpc solutions | Absent | alchemy.com, dwellir.com, x.com |
| blockchain node rpc software | Absent | chainstack.com, cyfrin.io, quicknode.com |
| blockchain node rpc platform | Absent | quicknode.com, sourceforge.net, cherryservers.com |
| top blockchain node rpc providers | Absent | alchemy.com, bitcoinfoundation.org, coingecko.com |
| blockchain node rpc comparison | Absent | onfinality.io, blog.onfinality.io, coingecko.com |
| best smart contract monitoring | Cited | tenderly.co, milkroad.com, alchemy.com |
| smart contract monitoring vendors | Cited | tenderly.co, milkroad.com, alchemy.com |
| smart contract monitoring solutions | Cited | lossless.io, blocksec.com, community.nasscom.in |
| smart contract monitoring software | Cited | ethereum.org, alchemy.com, tenderly.co |
| smart contract monitoring platform | Cited | kaleido.io, tenderly.co, blockaid.io |
| top smart contract monitoring providers | Absent | alchemy.com, cellframe.net, forta.org |
| smart contract monitoring comparison | Named, not cited | nhimg.org, kannaudits.com, hacken.io |
| alternatives to Tenderly | Cited | tenderly.co, quicknode.com, alchemy.com |
| Tenderly vs Alchemy | Cited | alchemy.com, quicknode.com, eco.com |
| Tenderly vs Hardhat | Cited | docs.tenderly.co, github.com, startupik.com |
| Tenderly vs QuickNode | Cited | x.com, rfp.wiki, quicknode.com |
Tenderly is cited in 21 of the 39 AI answers we triggered.
Tenderly presents as web3 development, smart contract debugging, transaction simulation, blockchain node RPC, smart contract monitoring. AI Overviews cite it on Smart Contract Debugging, Transaction Simulation, Smart Contract Monitoring and it is absent on Web3 Development, Blockchain Node Rpc.
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days
Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days
| Domain AI cites | Pages | Context |
|---|---|---|
| alchemy.com | 15 | Cited on 15 of the queries we tested. |
| quicknode.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| medium.com | 8 | Cited on 8 of the queries we tested. |
| youtube.com | 7 | Cited on 7 of the queries we tested. |
| dwellir.com | 5 | Cited on 5 of the queries we tested. |
| chainstack.com | 5 | Cited on 5 of the queries we tested. |
| infura.io | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
| sourceforge.net | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
| cyfrin.io | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
| slashdot.org | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
See which queries each peer won →
Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of Tenderly on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.
| Peer | How AI frames it |
|---|---|
| alchemy.com | Cited on 15 of the tested queries. |
| quicknode.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| medium.com | Cited on 8 of the tested queries. |
| youtube.com | Cited on 7 of the tested queries. |
| dwellir.com | Cited on 5 of the tested queries. |
| chainstack.com | Cited on 5 of the tested queries. |
| infura.io | Cited on 4 of the tested queries. |
| sourceforge.net | Cited on 4 of the tested queries. |