A look at how RADICL is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.
RADICL is cited in 14 of 39 AI answers. It shows up on Virtual Soc, Nist 800-171 Compliance, Radicl. It is absent on Managed Detection And Response, Cmmc Compliance, Attack Surface Management.
AI answers fire on 100% of tracked queries, yet RADICL is quoted in only 36% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.
Managed Cybersecurity & CMMC Compliance for DIB & Regulated Industries Product How It Works RADICL XPerience How We Compare vSOC Reviews Services Managed Compliance Adherence (MCA) Managed Log Analytics (MLA) Managed Detection &radicl.com, 2026
Differentiators it leads with: Managed Detection And Response, CMMC Compliance, Virtual SOC, Attack Surface Management.
Cited as a provider on Virtual Soc, Nist 800-171 Compliance, Radicl queries.
Appears alongside youtube.com, gartner.com, sentinelone.com.
See the full query-by-query breakdown →
| Topic | Presence in AI answers | Buyer intent |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Soc | Owned | positioning |
| Nist 800-171 Compliance | Owned | positioning |
| Radicl | Owned | comparison |
| Managed Detection And Response | Invisible | positioning |
| Cmmc Compliance | Invisible | positioning |
| Attack Surface Management | Invisible | positioning |
Problem Aware. Overview queries: RADICL appears on 3 of 6 themes.
Solution Aware. Owned on Virtual Soc, Nist 800-171 Compliance, Radicl; absent on Managed Detection And Response, Cmmc Compliance, Attack Surface Management.
Alternatives. 0 themes name the brand without citing it; 25 queries answer without it at all.
Executed by AUQ for B2B SaaS teams with the same gaps this audit found.
39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means RADICL's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.
| Query | RADICL in the AI answer | Top sources cited |
|---|---|---|
| best managed detection and response | Absent | gartner.com, sangfor.com, defendify.com |
| managed detection and response vendors | Absent | gartner.com, intezer.com, defendify.com |
| managed detection and response solutions | Absent | redcanary.com, gartner.com, sangfor.com |
| managed detection and response software | Absent | gartner.com, paloaltonetworks.com, sangfor.com |
| managed detection and response platform | Absent | seceon.com, gartner.com, microsoft.com |
| top managed detection and response providers | Cited | gartner.com, neweratech.com, youtube.com |
| managed detection and response comparison | Absent | gartner.com, redcanary.com, esentire.com |
| best cmmc compliance | Absent | reddit.com, healthcareresolutionservices.com, vanta.com |
| cmmc compliance vendors | Absent | reddit.com, cbh.com, totalassure.com |
| cmmc compliance solutions | Absent | cybersheath.com, bpm.com, madsecurity.com |
| cmmc compliance software | Absent | reddit.com, motherbearsecurity.com, hyperproof.io |
| cmmc compliance platform | Absent | industrialcyber.co, vanta.com, drata.com |
| top cmmc compliance providers | Absent | totalassure.com, madsecurity.com, a-lign.com |
| cmmc compliance comparison | Absent | huntress.com, cmmccompliance.us, hypervigilance.com |
| best virtual soc | Absent | youtube.com, digitalxraid.com, ambient.ai |
| virtual soc vendors | Cited | radicl.com, lumen.com, paloaltonetworks.com |
| virtual soc solutions | Cited | radicl.com, digitalxraid.com, helpnetsecurity.com |
| virtual soc software | Cited | youtube.com, reddit.com, brotherskeep.co |
| virtual soc platform | Cited | radicl.com, fortinet.com, digitalxraid.com |
| top virtual soc providers | Cited | radicl.com, prophetsecurity.ai, gartner.com |
| virtual soc comparison | Absent | digitalxraid.com, cybermaxx.com, rewterz.com |
| best attack surface management | Absent | gartner.com, reddit.com, upguard.com |
| attack surface management vendors | Absent | gartner.com, sentinelone.com, synack.com |
| attack surface management solutions | Absent | gartner.com, sentinelone.com, group-ib.com |
| attack surface management software | Absent | sentinelone.com, synack.com, rapid7.com |
| attack surface management platform | Absent | sentinelone.com, gartner.com, synack.com |
| top attack surface management providers | Absent | gartner.com, sentinelone.com, synack.com |
| attack surface management comparison | Absent | linkedin.com, cyberproof.com, ionix.io |
| best nist 800-171 compliance | Cited | atlantsecurity.com, varonis.com, scrut.io |
| nist 800-171 compliance vendors | Cited | radicl.com, apptega.com, vanta.com |
| nist 800-171 compliance solutions | Cited | cuicktrac.com, radicl.com, testpros.com |
| nist 800-171 compliance software | Cited | apptega.com, riskwatch.com, vanta.com |
| nist 800-171 compliance platform | Absent | riskwatch.com, carbidesecure.com, preveil.com |
| top nist 800-171 compliance providers | Cited | radicl.com, atlantsecurity.com, testpros.com |
| nist 800-171 compliance comparison | Absent | getsecureslate.com, viexperts.com, ignyteplatform.com |
| alternatives to RADICL | Absent | slashdot.org, dictionary.cambridge.org, impactful.ninja |
| RADICL vs Arctic Wolf | Cited | radicl.com, sophos.com, n-able.com |
| RADICL vs Huntress | Cited | huntress.com, reddit.com, unio.digital |
| RADICL vs Expel | Cited | expel.com, radicl.com, esentire.com |
RADICL is cited in 14 of the 39 AI answers we triggered.
RADICL presents as managed detection and response, CMMC compliance, virtual SOC, attack surface management, NIST 800-171 compliance. AI Overviews cite it on Virtual Soc, Nist 800-171 Compliance, Radicl and it is absent on Managed Detection And Response, Cmmc Compliance, Attack Surface Management.
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days
Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days
| Domain AI cites | Pages | Context |
|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | 16 | Cited on 16 of the queries we tested. |
| gartner.com | 11 | Cited on 11 of the queries we tested. |
| sentinelone.com | 10 | Cited on 10 of the queries we tested. |
| paloaltonetworks.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| reddit.com | 8 | Cited on 8 of the queries we tested. |
| synack.com | 7 | Cited on 7 of the queries we tested. |
| sophos.com | 5 | Cited on 5 of the queries we tested. |
| sangfor.com | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
| rapid7.com | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
| huntress.com | 4 | Cited on 4 of the queries we tested. |
See which queries each peer won →
Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of RADICL on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.
| Peer | How AI frames it |
|---|---|
| youtube.com | Cited on 16 of the tested queries. |
| gartner.com | Cited on 11 of the tested queries. |
| sentinelone.com | Cited on 10 of the tested queries. |
| paloaltonetworks.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| reddit.com | Cited on 8 of the tested queries. |
| synack.com | Cited on 7 of the tested queries. |
| sophos.com | Cited on 5 of the tested queries. |
| sangfor.com | Cited on 4 of the tested queries. |