GEO AUDIT · BRAND-ONLY

Kaleido.

A look at how Kaleido is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.

Sitekaleido.io

Where we lookedGoogle AI Overviews, US

Questions tested39 brand, category, and competitor queries

PreparedOctober 7, 2026 · by AUQ

AI Visibility Score

out of 100. Low band. Kaleido is cited in 7 of 39 AI answers. It shows up on Kaleido. It is absent on Enterprise Blockchain, Asset Tokenization, Digital Asset Custody.

Verified AI Overview citations

Kaleido's brand is cited in 7 of the 39 AI-answer queries we tested.

AI answer trigger rate

100%

Google's AI answer box fires on 39 of 39 tracked queries.

Citation rate when AI answers

18%

Share of AI-answer queries where the brand is actually quoted.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Kaleido scores 26 of 100 for AI Overview visibility. The work is closing the citation and identity gaps.

Kaleido is cited in 7 of 39 AI answers. It shows up on Kaleido. It is absent on Enterprise Blockchain, Asset Tokenization, Digital Asset Custody.

AI answers fire on 100% of tracked queries, yet Kaleido is quoted in only 18% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.

AI Visibility Score

Low band

BarelyLowCompetitiveDominant

What's in the score

Your pages being quoted 35%18 / 100
Inclusion in category answers 25%26 / 100
How AI describes the brand 20%50 / 100
Topic coverage breadth 20%17 / 100

IDENTITY IN AI OVERVIEWS

How the brand describes itself, and how Google's AI describes it.

What the brand says about itself

Enterprise Blockchain

Kaleido | Enterprise Blockchain, Tokenization, and Digital Asset Platform announcement Kaleido serves as technology partner for Project Agorá alongside the BIS and 40+ financial institutions -> Log In Try It Free Products Kaleido Platforkaleido.io, 2026

Differentiators it leads with: Enterprise Blockchain, Asset Tokenization, Digital Asset Custody, Blockchain As A Service.

What Google's AI says

Recognized in AI answers for Kaleido

Cited as a provider on Kaleido queries.

Appears alongside linkedin.com, fireblocks.com, g2.com.

The core gap

Kaleido presents as enterprise blockchain, asset tokenization, digital asset custody, blockchain as a service, stablecoin infrastructure. AI Overviews cite it on Kaleido and it is absent on Enterprise Blockchain, Asset Tokenization, Digital Asset Custody.

Words AI uses for the brand

Kaleido

The brand's own pillars that AI omits

Enterprise BlockchainAsset TokenizationDigital Asset CustodyCited source on vendor and comparison queries

CONTENT AND ENTITY COVERAGE

The topics that matter to the brand, and where it shows up in AI answers today.

See the full query-by-query breakdown →

Topic	Presence in AI answers	Buyer intent
Kaleido	Owned	comparison
Enterprise Blockchain	Invisible	positioning
Asset Tokenization	Invisible	positioning
Digital Asset Custody	Invisible	positioning
Blockchain As A Service	Invisible	positioning
Stablecoin Infrastructure	Invisible	positioning

Buyer-journey coverage

Problem Aware. Overview queries: Kaleido appears on 1 of 6 themes.

Solution Aware. Owned on Kaleido; absent on Enterprise Blockchain, Asset Tokenization, Digital Asset Custody.

Alternatives. 3 themes name the brand without citing it; 29 queries answer without it at all.

AI OVERVIEW PERFORMANCE

Where the brand shows up in Google's AI, and the high-value queries it is missing.

See all queries we tested →

Tracked keywords

Brand, category, and comparison queries analyzed.

AI answers fired

100% of tracked queries trigger an AI Overview.

Times brand cited

18% citation rate when AI answers.

Total brand mentions

Across all observed AI responses.

Case Studies

This playbook has already worked. Here's the proof.

Executed by AUQ for B2B SaaS teams with the same gaps this audit found.

1,000+ Fraud.net AI citations earned in 6 months through GEO prompt research and content automation. Read the case study → +173% Microblink Organic traffic growth from technical SEO, content automation, and GEO-focused linkbuilding. Read the case study → +30,000 AKOOL Visits in 6 months via technical optimizations and content strategy we executed end-to-end. Read the case study → +200% DeepInfra Technical blog traffic growth from a blog redesign, author training, and SaaS linkbuilding. Read the case study →

Get results like these for Kaleido → See all case studies

QUERIES WE TESTED

Every query we ran against Google's AI Overview, and what we found.

39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means Kaleido's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.

Query	Kaleido in the AI answer	Top sources cited
best enterprise blockchain	Cited	revenuebase.ai, gartner.com, medium.com
enterprise blockchain vendors	Cited	thinkmobiles.com, alchemy.com, webisoft.com
enterprise blockchain solutions	Absent	blogs.oracle.com, linuxfoundation.org, infosys.com
enterprise blockchain software	Named, not cited	aws.amazon.com, geniusee.com, quora.com
enterprise blockchain platform	Absent	ideas2goal.com, ieeexplore.ieee.org, coherentlab.com
top enterprise blockchain providers	Named, not cited	revenuebase.ai, intellivon.com, builtin.com
enterprise blockchain comparison	Absent	errna.com, vegavid.com, blockchain-development-solutions.com
best asset tokenization	Absent	xchange.avixa.org, bitcoinfoundation.org, fluidrwa.com
asset tokenization vendors	Absent	aminagroup.com, antier.com, alphapoint.com
asset tokenization solutions	Absent	dtcc.com, broadridge.com, securitize.io
asset tokenization software	Absent	tokeny.com, securitize.io, g2.com
asset tokenization platform	Absent	securitize.io, hedera.com, dtcc.com
top asset tokenization providers	Absent	fluidrwa.com, app.rwa.xyz, interexy.com
asset tokenization comparison	Absent	chain.link, brickken.com, metamask.io
best digital asset custody	Absent	agioratings.io, taurushq.com, bitcoinfoundation.org
digital asset custody vendors	Absent	agioratings.io, cobo.com, info.softserveinc.com
digital asset custody solutions	Absent	fireblocks.com, bny.com, bitgo.com
digital asset custody software	Absent	wellsfargoadvisors.com, taurushq.com, linkedin.com
digital asset custody platform	Absent	fireblocks.com, fidelitydigitalassets.com, anchorage.com
top digital asset custody providers	Absent	fireblocks.com, fidelitydigitalassets.com, milkroad.com
digital asset custody comparison	Absent	linkedin.com, vaultody.com, agioratings.io
best blockchain as a service	Absent	webisoft.com, accubits.com, slashdot.org
blockchain as a service vendors	Absent	antier.com, quicknode.com, chainstack.com
blockchain as a service solutions	Absent	alibabacloud.com, azure.microsoft.com, aws.amazon.com
blockchain as a service software	Absent	gartner.com, investopedia.com, en.wikipedia.org
blockchain as a service platform	Cited	gartner.com, aezion.com, investopedia.com
top blockchain as a service providers	Absent	techbehemoths.com, linkedin.com, ideausher.com
blockchain as a service comparison	Named, not cited	gartner.com, sciencedirect.com, pluralsight.com
best stablecoin infrastructure	Absent	eco.com, chain.link, hifi.com
stablecoin infrastructure vendors	Absent	paymentgenes.com, digg.com, facebook.com
stablecoin infrastructure solutions	Absent	paymentgenes.com, cbinsights.com, linkedin.com
stablecoin infrastructure software	Absent	themalaysianreserve.com, merge.money, financialit.net
stablecoin infrastructure platform	Absent	bridge.xyz, stripe.com, crossmint.com
top stablecoin infrastructure providers	Absent	eco.com, fireblocks.com, stablecoininsider.org
stablecoin infrastructure comparison	Absent	fireblocks.com, fintech24h.com, stablecoininsider.org
alternatives to Kaleido	Cited	gartner.com, settlemint.com, trustradius.com
Kaleido vs Fireblocks	Cited	restartfintech.com, g2.com, linkedin.com
Kaleido vs Chainstack	Cited	g2.com, rfp.wiki, slashdot.org
Kaleido vs Alchemy	Cited	alchemy.com, marketplace.microsoft.com, kaleido.io

THREE FINDINGS THAT MATTER

The brand is missing from 82% of AI-answer queries

Kaleido is cited in 7 of the 39 AI answers we triggered.

AI misreads the category

TOP THREE MOVES

Win presence on Enterprise Blockchain

Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days

Convert named-not-cited queries into citations

Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days

Earn placement in the third-party listicles AI cites

Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days

WHERE GOOGLE'S AI GETS ITS ANSWERS

The sources Google's AI cites in this category, and what it tells you about earning citations.

Domain AI cites	Pages	Context
linkedin.com	15	Cited on 15 of the queries we tested.
fireblocks.com	10	Cited on 10 of the queries we tested.
g2.com	9	Cited on 9 of the queries we tested.
youtube.com	8	Cited on 8 of the queries we tested.
bitgo.com	7	Cited on 7 of the queries we tested.
stripe.com	7	Cited on 7 of the queries we tested.
bitcoinfoundation.org	6	Cited on 6 of the queries we tested.
fluidrwa.com	6	Cited on 6 of the queries we tested.
agioratings.io	6	Cited on 6 of the queries we tested.
circle.com	6	Cited on 6 of the queries we tested.

Reading

Independent listicles, communities, and rival explainers win the citations Kaleido is missing. Earning AI citation on the invisible themes means placement on those third-party pages, not only owning its own glossary.

AI-REVEALED PEERS

The competitive set drawn by Google's AI itself. Observed, not chosen.

See which queries each peer won →

Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of Kaleido on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.

Peer	How AI frames it
linkedin.com	Cited on 15 of the tested queries.
fireblocks.com	Cited on 10 of the tested queries.
g2.com	Cited on 9 of the tested queries.
youtube.com	Cited on 8 of the tested queries.
bitgo.com	Cited on 7 of the tested queries.
stripe.com	Cited on 7 of the tested queries.
bitcoinfoundation.org	Cited on 6 of the tested queries.
fluidrwa.com	Cited on 6 of the tested queries.

Key observation

linkedin.com is the most-cited source across the queries Kaleido is missing.