GEO AUDIT · BRAND-ONLY

enji.ai.

A look at how enji.ai is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.

Siteenji.ai

Where we lookedGoogle AI Overviews, US

Questions tested40 brand, category, and competitor queries

PreparedJune 3, 2026 · by AUQ

AI Visibility Score

out of 100. Critical band. The brand has no functional AIO presence. Immediate foundational work is required before any optimization can take effect.

Verified AI Overview citations

enji.ai's brand is cited in 0 of the 29 AI-answer queries we tested.

AI answer trigger rate

72.5%

Google's AI answer box fires on 29 of 40 tracked queries.

Citation rate when AI answers

0% (of all tracked keywords)

Share of AI-answer queries where the brand is actually quoted.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

enji.ai scores 11 of 100 for AI Overview visibility. The work is closing the citation and identity gaps.

The brand has no functional AIO presence. Immediate foundational work is required before any optimization can take effect.

AI answers fire on 72.5% of tracked queries, yet enji.ai is quoted in only 0% (of all tracked keywords) of them. When it does appear, it sits Not applicable; brand is never cited.

AI Visibility Score

Critical band

BarelyLowCompetitiveDominant

What's in the score

How AI describes the brand0 / 100
How often AI answers appear73 / 100
Quality of placement when cited0 / 100
Topic coverage breadth18 / 100
Inclusion in category answers0 / 100

THREE FINDINGS THAT MATTER

The brand is missing from most of AI-answer queries

All 196 Brand Radar mentions are attributable to the anime character name collision, not to the software platform. AIO does not recognize enji.ai as a source on any category query.

AI misreads the category

AIO places 'Enji' in the anime and pop culture category rather than project management or delivery intelligence software. This is not a category misalignment but a complete entity non-recognition crisis.

TOP THREE MOVES

Build entity disambiguation signals across the web by creating Organization schema on enji.ai, claiming a Wikidata entry, and ensuring Crunchbase and LinkedIn company pages are complete and consistent

Impact Critical · effort Medium · Days 1-30

Publish a pillar page for 'delivery intelligence platform' with 1,500 to 2,000 words of authoritative content, clear entity signals, and structured data

Impact High · effort Medium · Days 1-30

Earn third-party citations on software review platforms (G2, Capterra, Product Hunt) to provide credible external pages for AIO to cite

Impact High · effort Low · Days 1-30

CONTENT AND ENTITY COVERAGE

The topics that matter to the brand, and where it shows up in AI answers today.

Topic	Presence in AI answers	Buyer intent
KTLO meaning	Owned	buyer education
RAG status in project management	Owned	buyer education
Productivity software definition	Owned	buyer education
Outsourcing management	Owned	buyer education
Project visibility	Owned	buyer education
Remote team management	Partial	buyer education
Employee pulse and burnout	Partial	buyer education
Project oversight	Partial	buyer education
Software ROI measurement	Partial	buyer intent
Key risk indicators	Partial	buyer intent
Delivery intelligence platform	Invisible	core category
AI project management tools	Invisible	solution-aware
Software delivery reporting automation	Invisible	solution-aware
Feature cost tracking software	Invisible	unique differentiator
Engineering manager reporting tools	Invisible	buyer intent
Delivery intelligence platform comparison	Invisible	alternatives
Best project management tools for remote teams	Invisible	alternatives

Buyer-journey coverage

Problem Aware. Partially covered via glossary terms. Not covered for core pain points like fragmented project data or management overhead.

Solution Aware. Very weak. No AIO presence for 'best delivery intelligence platform' or 'AI project management tools'.

Alternatives. Not covered. No AIO presence on comparison or alternatives queries.

IDENTITY IN AI OVERVIEWS

How the brand describes itself, and how Google's AI describes it.

What the brand says about itself

Delivery Intelligence Platform

AI-powered platform that translates business and employee activity data into strategic decisions for remote and hybrid software teams. Automates delivery reporting, centralizes project data from Jira, Slack, and GitHub, and surfaces real-time insights for managers and executives.enji.ai, 2026

Differentiators it leads with: Project Narrative technology, On-premise option, Feature-level cost tracking, 60% management time savings, 83% reduction in manual reporting time, Burnout detection via AI.

What Google's AI says

Anime character (My Hero Academia)

Enji Todoroki, Pro Hero Endeavor from My Hero Academia

All 196 tracked AIO mentions relate to the anime character Enji Todoroki, not the SaaS platform

The core gap

Words AI uses for the brand

none surfaced

The brand's own pillars that AI omits

Complete entity name collision with anime character Enji Todoroki from My Hero AcademiaBrand is fully invisible in AI Overviews on its own nameZero awareness of enji.ai as a delivery intelligence or software productBrand name entirely owned by fictional character in Google's knowledge graph

AI OVERVIEW PERFORMANCE

Where the brand shows up in Google's AI, and the high-value queries it is missing.

Tracked keywords

Brand, category, and comparison queries analyzed.

AI answers fired

72.5% of tracked queries trigger an AI Overview.

Times brand cited

0% (of all tracked keywords) citation rate when AI answers.

Total brand mentions

196

Across all observed AI responses.

HIGH-VALUE QUERIES WHERE THE BRAND RANKS BUT IS NOT QUOTED

Query	Volume	Organic rank	What happens
PMIS	2500	#Not cited by brand despite AIO presence	Glossary page exists but is not cited in AIO despite AIO triggering on query
AI project management tools	High-volume category query	#Brand absent from AIO	High-volume category query with AIO triggers. Brand has no content directly targeting this framing.
Software delivery reporting automation	Core use case	#Brand absent from AIO	Core use case of the product. No dedicated content asset ranks or gets cited in AIO.
Feature cost tracking software	Unique differentiator	#Brand absent from AIO	Unique product differentiator. No organic or AIO presence detected for this angle.
Engineering manager reporting tools	Primary buyer intent	#Brand absent from AIO	Primary buyer audience query type. No AIO citation found.

Case Studies

This playbook has already worked. Here's the proof.

Executed by AUQ for B2B SaaS teams with the same gaps this audit found.

1,000+ Fraud.net AI citations earned in 6 months through GEO prompt research and content automation. Read the case study → +173% Microblink Organic traffic growth from technical SEO, content automation, and GEO-focused linkbuilding. Read the case study → +30,000 AKOOL Visits in 6 months via technical optimizations and content strategy we executed end-to-end. Read the case study → +200% DeepInfra Technical blog traffic growth from a blog redesign, author training, and SaaS linkbuilding. Read the case study →

Get results like these for enji.ai → See all case studies

WHERE GOOGLE'S AI GETS ITS ANSWERS

The sources Google's AI cites in this category, and what it tells you about earning citations.

Domain AI cites	Pages	Context
myheroacademia.fandom.com	17	Anime character entity collision
www.reddit.com	55	Anime character discussions
www.youtube.com	33	Anime content
www.quora.com	15	Anime character questions
en.wikipedia.org	5	Anime character articles
www.enji.io	5	Different brand, same name prefix. Potential secondary collision.

Reading

No pages from enji.ai appear in any AIO citation. The brand has zero footprint in the AIO source graph. All citation activity flows to anime content and a separate domain (enji.io), which creates additional name confusion risk in AIO.

AI-REVEALED PEERS

The competitive set drawn by Google's AI itself. Observed, not chosen.

Peers will become visible once the brand gains AIO presence and comparison queries return software results. Comparison prompts should be manually reviewed once the entity is correctly resolved in AIO to surface true SaaS peers.

Peer	How AI frames it
enji.io	Appears in AIO citation data but is a separate brand with name prefix collision

Key observation

No direct same-category peer citations could be extracted because enji.ai has zero AIO citations on category queries. The citation landscape is entirely dominated by the name collision.

90-DAY ROADMAP

Three sprints from first wins to compounding category presence.

Month 1 · Days 1 to 30

Deploy Organization and SoftwareApplication schema sitewide
Create or update Wikidata, Crunchbase, LinkedIn, and G2 listings
Publish delivery intelligence platform pillar page
Add FAQ schema to top 5 glossary pages

Month 2 · Days 31 to 60

Publish three solution-aware content pieces targeting buyer-intent queries
Build internal link clusters from glossary pages to pillar page and product pages
Pitch thought-leadership placements on engineering and PM blogs for backlinks
Update Product Hunt, Capterra, and G2 profiles with current feature set

Month 3 · Days 61 to 90

Re-run Brand Radar on updated prompt set to measure citation rate improvement
Identify AIO-revealed peers now visible after entity resolution
Produce comparison and alternatives content based on observed peers
Expand glossary coverage to PMIS, AI assistance, and engineering metrics topics