A look at how Oncrawl is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.
Oncrawl is cited in 2 of 39 AI answers. It shows up on Oncrawl. It is absent on Technical Seo, Website Crawler, Log File Analysis.
AI answers fire on 100% of tracked queries, yet Oncrawl is quoted in only 5% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.
Oncrawl | Technical SEO Data for Competitive Websites Platform Workflows Control your technical performance Understand and influence your visibility Scale your SEO impact AI Search & Visibility Capabilities Crawler Log Analyzer Lenses Aoncrawl.com, 2026
Differentiators it leads with: Technical SEO, Website Crawler, Log File Analysis, SEO Analytics.
Cited as a provider on Oncrawl queries.
Appears alongside youtube.com, YouTube, semrush.com.
See the full query-by-query breakdown →
| Topic | Presence in AI answers | Buyer intent |
|---|---|---|
| Oncrawl | Owned | comparison |
| Technical Seo | Invisible | positioning |
| Website Crawler | Invisible | positioning |
| Log File Analysis | Invisible | positioning |
| Seo Analytics | Invisible | positioning |
| Enterprise Seo | Invisible | positioning |
Problem Aware. overview queries: Oncrawl appears on 1 of 6 themes.
Solution Aware. Owned on Oncrawl; absent on Technical Seo, Website Crawler, Log File Analysis.
Alternatives. 3 themes name the brand without citing it; 34 queries answer without it at all.
39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means Oncrawl's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.
| Query | Type | Oncrawl in the AI answer | Top sources cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| best technical seo | Positioning | Absent | youtube.com, semrush.com, developers.google.com |
| technical seo vendors | Positioning | Absent | onely.com, saleshive.com, softtrix.com |
| technical seo solutions | Positioning | Absent | developers.google.com, onely.com, saffronedge.com |
| technical seo software | Positioning | Absent | technicalseo.com, nimblechapps.com, zapier.com |
| technical seo platform | Positioning | Absent | lumar.io, journeyh.io, zapier.com |
| top technical seo providers | Positioning | Absent | onely.com, saleshive.com, clutch.co |
| technical seo comparison | Positioning | Absent | seobility.net, nav43.com, dbswebsite.com |
| best website crawler | Positioning | Absent | firecrawl.dev, kdnuggets.com, octoparse.com |
| website crawler vendors | Positioning | Absent | octoparse.com, crawlbase.com, outsourcebigdata.com |
| website crawler solutions | Positioning | Absent | akamai.com, reddit.com, firecrawl.dev |
| website crawler software | Positioning | Absent | screamingfrog.co.uk, en.wikipedia.org, cloudflare.com |
| website crawler platform | Positioning | Absent | firecrawl.dev, lumar.io, webscraper.io |
| top website crawler providers | Positioning | Absent | firecrawl.dev, thunderbit.com, marsproxies.com |
| website crawler comparison | Positioning | Absent | olostep.com, marsproxies.com, aimultiple.com |
| best log file analysis | Positioning | Absent | reddit.com, logmanager.com, splunk.com |
| log file analysis vendors | Positioning | Absent | motadata.com, splunk.com, reddit.com |
| log file analysis solutions | Positioning | Absent | splunk.com, logmanager.com, motadata.com |
| log file analysis software | Positioning | Absent | reddit.com, splunk.com, datadoghq.com |
| log file analysis platform | Positioning | Absent | reddit.com, splunk.com, en.wikipedia.org |
| top log file analysis providers | Positioning | Absent | cribl.io, motadata.com, openobserve.ai |
| log file analysis comparison | Positioning | Named, not cited | motadata.com, screamingfrog.co.uk, semrush.com |
| best seo analytics | Positioning | Absent | semrush.com, fourfront.us, agencyanalytics.com |
| seo analytics vendors | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, siteimprove.com, fourfront.us |
| seo analytics solutions | Positioning | Absent | goinflow.com, siteimprove.com, brandefenders.com |
| seo analytics software | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, seoptimer.com, zapier.com |
| seo analytics platform | Positioning | Absent | semrush.com, siteimprove.com, agencyanalytics.com |
| top seo analytics providers | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, zapier.com, techradar.com |
| seo analytics comparison | Positioning | Absent | firstpagesage.com, targetinternet.com, zapier.com |
| best enterprise seo | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, g2.com, prosperitymedia.com.au |
| enterprise seo vendors | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, webfx.com, brightedge.com |
| enterprise seo solutions | Positioning | Absent | brightedge.com, gartner.com, webfx.com |
| enterprise seo software | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, brightedge.com, seocrawl.ai |
| enterprise seo platform | Positioning | Absent | brightedge.com, searchenginejournal.com, viciousmarketing.net |
| top enterprise seo providers | Positioning | Absent | animalz.co, searchbloom.com, clutch.co |
| enterprise seo comparison | Positioning | Absent | adcetera.com, viciousmarketing.net, searchbloom.com |
| alternatives to Oncrawl | Comparison | Named, not cited | g2.com, sitebulb.com, reddit.com |
| Oncrawl vs Botify | Comparison | Cited | youtube.com, cuspera.com, growthmanager.ai |
| Oncrawl vs Screaming Frog | Comparison | Named, not cited | 6sense.com, growthmanager.ai, pikaseo.com |
| Oncrawl vs Semrush | Comparison | Cited | g2.com, reddit.com, cuspera.com |
Oncrawl is cited in 2 of the 39 AI answers we triggered.
Oncrawl presents as technical SEO, website crawler, log file analysis, SEO analytics, enterprise SEO. AI Overviews cite it on Oncrawl and it is absent on Technical Seo, Website Crawler, Log File Analysis.
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days
Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days
| Domain AI cites | Pages | Context |
|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | 19 | Cited on 19 of the queries we tested. |
| YouTube | 19 | Cited on 19 of the queries we tested. |
| semrush.com | 14 | Cited on 14 of the queries we tested. |
| logmanager.com | 14 | Cited on 14 of the queries we tested. |
| gartner.com | 13 | Cited on 13 of the queries we tested. |
| Gartner | 13 | Cited on 13 of the queries we tested. |
| Semrush | 12 | Cited on 12 of the queries we tested. |
| reddit.com | 10 | Cited on 10 of the queries we tested. |
| 10 | Cited on 10 of the queries we tested. | |
| screamingfrog.co.uk | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
See which queries each peer won →
Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of Oncrawl on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.
| Peer | How AI frames it |
|---|---|
| youtube.com | Cited on 19 of the tested queries. |
| YouTube | Cited on 19 of the tested queries. |
| semrush.com | Cited on 14 of the tested queries. |
| logmanager.com | Cited on 14 of the tested queries. |
| gartner.com | Cited on 13 of the tested queries. |
| Gartner | Cited on 13 of the tested queries. |
| Semrush | Cited on 12 of the tested queries. |
| reddit.com | Cited on 10 of the tested queries. |