A look at how Akto is described, positioned, and quoted inside Google's AI Overviews, the AI answer box at the top of search results, and where the brand shows up versus goes missing.
Akto is cited in 9 of 37 AI answers. It shows up on Akto. It is absent on Api Security, Api Discovery, Ai Agent Security.
AI answers fire on 95% of tracked queries, yet Akto is quoted in only 24% of them. When it does appear, it sits as a listed provider, rarely the lead source.
Akto: #1 AI Agent Security Solution for Modern AI Security Teams [Black Hat USA 2026] Meet Akto team at Booth #8508. Book a meeting-> [Black Hat USA 2026] Meet Akto team at Booth #8508. Book a meeting-> [Black Hat USA 2026] Meet Aktoakto.io, 2026
Differentiators it leads with: API Security, API Discovery, AI Agent Security, API Penetration Testing.
Cited as a provider on Akto queries.
Appears alongside youtube.com, stackhawk.com, cycognito.com.
See the full query-by-query breakdown →
| Topic | Presence in AI answers | Buyer intent |
|---|---|---|
| Akto | Owned | comparison |
| Api Security | Invisible | positioning |
| Api Discovery | Invisible | positioning |
| Ai Agent Security | Invisible | positioning |
| Api Penetration Testing | Invisible | positioning |
| Mcp Security | Invisible | positioning |
Problem Aware. overview queries: Akto appears on 1 of 6 themes.
Solution Aware. Owned on Akto; absent on Api Security, Api Discovery, Ai Agent Security.
Alternatives. 2 themes name the brand without citing it; 26 queries answer without it at all.
39 queries across branded, positioning, and comparison intent. "Cited" means Akto's own domain is a source in the AI answer. "Named, not cited" means the brand is mentioned but is not the source. "Absent" means the AI answered without it.
| Query | Type | Akto in the AI answer | Top sources cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| best api security | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, stackhawk.com, reddit.com |
| api security vendors | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, landbase.com, traceable.ai |
| api security solutions | Positioning | Absent | fastly.com, akamai.com, stackhawk.com |
| api security software | Positioning | Cited | traceable.ai, checkmarx.com, salt.security |
| api security platform | Positioning | Absent | traceable.ai, akamai.com, gartner.com |
| top api security providers | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, stackhawk.com, landbase.com |
| api security comparison | Positioning | Absent | gartner.com, apisec.ai, cycognito.com |
| best api discovery | Positioning | Absent | stackhawk.com, salt.security, youtube.com |
| api discovery vendors | Positioning | Cited | gartner.com, blog.axway.com, akamai.com |
| api discovery solutions | Positioning | Absent | stackhawk.com, paloaltonetworks.com, f5.com |
| api discovery software | Positioning | Cited | akamai.com, linkedin.com, openappsec.io |
| api discovery platform | Positioning | Absent | stackhawk.com, docs.invicti.com, invicti.com |
| top api discovery providers | Positioning | Absent | stackhawk.com, gartner.com, digiscorp.com |
| api discovery comparison | Positioning | Absent | invicti.com, cloudflare.com, wallarm.com |
| best ai agent security | Positioning | Absent | reco.ai, paloaltonetworks.com, cheatsheetseries.owasp.org |
| ai agent security vendors | Positioning | Absent | zenity.io, silverfort.com, paloaltonetworks.com |
| ai agent security solutions | Positioning | Absent | beyondtrust.com, silverfort.com, paloaltonetworks.com |
| ai agent security software | Positioning | Absent | zenity.io, silverfort.com, reco.ai |
| ai agent security platform | Positioning | Absent | silverfort.com, zenity.io, paloaltonetworks.com |
| top ai agent security providers | Positioning | Absent | tigera.io, reco.ai, zenity.io |
| ai agent security comparison | Positioning | Absent | reco.ai, paloaltonetworks.com, linx.security |
| best api penetration testing | Positioning | Named, not cited | reddit.com, youtube.com, owasp.org |
| api penetration testing vendors | Positioning | Absent | americantv.com, redfoxsec.com, capturethebug.xyz |
| api penetration testing solutions | Positioning | Absent | synack.com, akamai.com, stackhawk.com |
| api penetration testing software | Positioning | Absent | aress.com, kiwiqa.com, portswigger.net |
| api penetration testing platform | Positioning | Named, not cited | synack.com, cobalt.io, apisec.ai |
| top api penetration testing providers | Positioning | Absent | synack.com, deepstrike.io, owasp.org |
| api penetration testing comparison | Positioning | No AI answer | |
| best mcp security | Positioning | No AI answer | |
| mcp security vendors | Positioning | Cited | proofpoint.com, csoonline.com, mcpmanager.ai |
| mcp security solutions | Positioning | Absent | mcpmanager.ai, proofpoint.com, modelcontextprotocol.io |
| mcp security software | Positioning | Absent | checkpoint.com, reddit.com, truefoundry.com |
| mcp security platform | Positioning | Cited | proofpoint.com, akto.io, sentinelone.com |
| top mcp security providers | Positioning | Absent | truefoundry.com, snyk.io, mcpmanager.ai |
| mcp security comparison | Positioning | Absent | aembit.io, truefoundry.com, apisecuniversity.com |
| alternatives to Akto | Comparison | Cited | gartner.com, gcom.pdo.aws.gartner.com, akto.io |
| Akto vs Salt Security | Comparison | Cited | salt.security, akto.io, reddit.com |
| Akto vs Noname Security | Comparison | Cited | ammune.ai, salt.security, slashdot.org |
| Akto vs Traceable | Comparison | Cited | peerspot.com, slashdot.org, akto.io |
Akto is cited in 9 of the 37 AI answers we triggered.
Akto presents as API security, API discovery, AI agent security, API penetration testing, MCP security. AI Overviews cite it on Akto and it is absent on Api Security, Api Discovery, Ai Agent Security.
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 60 days
Impact medium · effort low · 0 to 30 days
Impact high · effort medium · 30 to 90 days
| Domain AI cites | Pages | Context |
|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | 22 | Cited on 22 of the queries we tested. |
| stackhawk.com | 16 | Cited on 16 of the queries we tested. |
| cycognito.com | 12 | Cited on 12 of the queries we tested. |
| gartner.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| owasp.org | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| akamai.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| paloaltonetworks.com | 9 | Cited on 9 of the queries we tested. |
| salt.security | 7 | Cited on 7 of the queries we tested. |
| apisec.ai | 7 | Cited on 7 of the queries we tested. |
| reddit.com | 6 | Cited on 6 of the queries we tested. |
See which queries each peer won →
Brands and domains Google's AI cites in place of Akto on the queries where it is absent. Observed, not chosen.
| Peer | How AI frames it |
|---|---|
| youtube.com | Cited on 22 of the tested queries. |
| stackhawk.com | Cited on 16 of the tested queries. |
| cycognito.com | Cited on 12 of the tested queries. |
| gartner.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| owasp.org | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| akamai.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| paloaltonetworks.com | Cited on 9 of the tested queries. |
| salt.security | Cited on 7 of the tested queries. |